This typical problem from the prolific H. E. Dudeney may be a bit tricky at first.
“104.—CATCHING THE THIEF.
“Now, constable,” said the defendant’s counsel in cross-examination,” you say that the prisoner was exactly twenty-seven steps ahead of you when you started to run after him?”
“Yes, sir.”
“And you swear that he takes eight steps to your five?”
“That is so.”
“Then I ask you, constable, as an intelligent man, to explain how you ever caught him, if that is the case?”
“Well, you see, I have got a longer stride. In fact, two of my steps are equal in length to five of the prisoner’s. If you work it out, you will find that the number of steps I required would bring me exactly to the spot where I captured him.”
Here the foreman of the jury asked for a few minutes to figure out the number of steps the constable must have taken. Can you also say how many steps the officer needed to catch the thief?”
See Catching the Thief for solutions.

Here is a fairly straight-forward problem from 500 Mathematical Challenges.

Here is another delightful problem from the Sherlock Holmes puzzle book by Dr. Watson (aka Tim Dedopulos).
Again we have a puzzle from the Sherlock Holmes puzzle book by Dr. Watson (aka Tim Dedopulos). This one is quite a bit more challenging, at least for me.
Here is a collection of puzzles from the great logic puzzle master Raymond Smullyan in a “Brain Bogglers” column for the 1996 Discover magazine.
Here is another problem (slightly edited) from the Sherlock Holmes puzzle book by Dr. Watson (aka Tim Dedopulos).
This is another problem from the 2020 Math Calendar.
The craziness of manipulating radicals strikes again. This 2006 four-star problem from Colin Hughes at Maths Challenge is really astonishing, though it takes the right key to unlock it.